The second determining
factor for textile production in Syria was (and
is) the access to raw materials. Two of these,
linen and wool, had been available since time
immemorial. Linen was mostly imported from
Egypt, and wool was supplied by the nomads of
the Syrian steppes and deserts. Silk and cotton,
on the other hand, were raw materials new to the
Mediterranean world and for a long time they had
to be imported. The control of raw materials and
the trade routes along which they were conveyed
was a major political concern. Silk, especially,
and the luxurious fabrics made from it, was not
only a necessary accessory for the whims and
lifestyle of a particular social class, it was
also of decisive economic and political
importance.
Syria's geography was
favorable for the introduction of silk at the
beginning of the sixth century in the northern
regions and the Orontes plain, as well as the
cultivation of cotton, particularly in the
region between Hama and Aleppo and on the upper
Euphrates. A typical product of Syria was,
therefore, a mixed weave of cotton and silk,
often an atlas fabric with stripes running
lengthwise, such as alepin, which is still
produced today.
Just as important as the
raw materials for the textiles were dyes. Before
the age of chemistry the procuring of natural
materials for the production of dyes was
time-consuming and expensive. Dyeing was part of
the enhancement of textiles and recipes and
dyeing techniques were guarded as jealously as
the secret of silkworm cultivation. The
emergence of the Islamic world changed and
improved things considerably regarding access to
raw materials. The expansion of trade in the
Islamic world and the opportunities it opened up
are illustrated by an anecdote told by
Saadi when lie describes his meeting with a rich
merchant on the island of Kish (quoted in
Lombard 1978:162). The merchant confided to
Saadi: "I would like to take Persian saffron to
China, where I have heard one can obtain a good
price for it, and then Chinese porcelain to
Byzantium, Byzantine brocade to India, Indian
steel to Aleppo, Aleppine glass to the Yemen and
striped Yemeni textiles to Persia."
Silk: Wealth and
Power
In antiquity silk was still a rarity. For a long time people did not even know
exactly what silk was, since China kept silkworm breeding and the production
and processing of silk a strictly guarded secret. It is not surprising that
people made concentrated efforts to discover this secret, or at least to
control the trade routes along which the silk came. Two important trade routes,
branches of the Silk Road, ended in Syria: one of the overland routes ran from
Central Asia via Persia and Iraq to Aleppo and on to Antioch. The other was a
sea-route from India across the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf to Basra from
where a land route could be taken either via Baghdad and Mosul to Aleppo, or
through the Syrian desert to Palmyra and thence to Damascus and Tyre. from
Syria the silk trade was continued into the Mediterranean and Europe.
Rome imported its silk from Syria and the Lebanon.
The silk-dealers, or sericarii had their own quarter in Rome. To wear
silk garments caused a sensation, and the response was not always enthusiastic.
For a time it was forbidden to wear silk garments in the Senate, since they
were regarded as feminine and therefore restricted to women. The Christians in
Rome were even more unambiguous, declaring that a true Christian does not
wear silk. But the seductive character o( the material was too great for these
puritanical attitudes to prevail. The wearing of silk garments soon became
habitual, for the rich and powerful. When the Syrian potentate Heliogabalus
from Homs visited Rome at the beginning of the third century he is supposed to
have been the first man to wear clothes made entirely of silk.
For Rome the silk trade became an important source
of revenue, but it remained dependent on Persia. When Diocletian made peace
with Persia in 297, the border and ;customs post at Nisibis became the hub of
the silk trade between the two empires. In 301 Diocletian fixed taxes and
prices for silk.
Palmyra, too, owed its rise to the silk trade.
Situated in the middle of the Syrian desert, it was the most important entrepot
for the caravan trade between the Euphrates and :he Mediterranean. During the
energetic rule of the legendary Queen Zenobia, in particular, this desert
kingdom
ruled from Palmyra achieved wealth and political
importance. There was trade not only in silk fabrics made in china, but
raw silk was also imported to be spun, woven, dyed - and, of course, worn.
Evidence of this is provided by fragments of textiles, including silk damask,
found at Palmyra. The style of clothing (above all the women's; costumes) and
jewellery seen in statues have in part persisted to the present day. But with
the shift of trade "outes due to wars and the resulting insecurity of the
"outes, Palmyra's heyday came to an end, and like so many places in Syria it
became a "dead city"; bedouins now rest in the shade of its majestic ruins.
There are many stories about how silk was smuggled
out of China. One of them tells how a Chinese princess, when she married a
prince from Khotan, took silk cocoons across the border in her bridal coiffure
to give them to her future husband as a present.
Byzantium's most important suppliers of silk were
central Asia and Persia. Duties and taxes made silk an expensive raw material
that was difficult to obtain. In order to cater for the demand
of the Byzantine court, Justinian established a monopoly of silk processing,
which was pracised exclusively in the state gynaecea (textile
factories). private silk weavers were forced onto the black market. When in 540
the war with Persia cut off the supply of silk, many Syrian and Lebanese
silk-weavers emigrated immediately to Persia. After their victory over
Byzantium the Persians finally gained control of the silk supply, which led to
a crisis in textile production in the gynaecea.
The secret of silk production was brought to Byzantium by two
Nestorian priests around 553. After a visit to their co-religionlsts in Central
Asia they returned across the border with the eggs of the silkworm moth
concealed in their walking sticks.
The leaves of the white mulberry tree, which grows
in the Syrian and Lebanese mountains, are the staple food of the silkworms.
Silk-spinning factories sprang up in Beirut, I Homs and Hama. Since this period
the production and processing of silk has been one of the most important
factors in the economy of the Syrian and Lebanese region.
When the Muslim armies under Khalid bin al-Walid
conquered Damascus, lie seized three hundred camel-loads of silk. The tribute
paid to him amounted to 10,000 gold pieces and 200 silk garments. Like the
early Christians in Rome the first Muslims regarded the use of silk as a luxury
that was detrimental to true religion, but in fact silk now became
indispensable for the Umayyad court, just as it had been for the Roman
emperors. This was often disapproved of: a Bedouin princess from the
Euphrates region is said to have told her husband, Muawiya, that wearing a
Bedouin cloak in the midst of her relatives would make her happier than all the
silk at the court of Damascus.
The conquest of Persia not only made the Islamic
world a serious rival to China in silk production, it also meant that it
controlled the most important routes of the Silk Road, giving it the monopoly
of the silk trade. Like the Byzantines before them, the caliphs and later
Muslim rulers established state workshops for their own requirements, but
without closing down the private workshops. The general name given to the
textiles made in these workshops is tiraz. Fatimid Egypt was famous
for them. Textiles played an important role in the politics of gift-giving of
the Muslim rulers. Honorific garments were bestowed and precious cloths were
horded. Garments and valuable cloths were passed down from generation to
generation together with the stories of how they were acquired. The detailed
knowledge about the variety and provenance of textiles as well as the need for
luxury textiles is very marked: "May God cover me with striped cloaks from the
Yemen, with linen cloths from Egypt, brocades from Byzantium, with silk from
Susa and China, Persian garments and capes from Isfahan, with atlas silk from
Baghdad and turban cloths from Ubull,... with Armenian breeches... and with
velvet from Merv. May God load me with carpets, with large carpets from
Qaliqala and Maisan, with mats from Baghdad." Such was the desire of a
well-to-do Muslim in the eleventh century (quoted in Eombard, 1987: 180).
The terms used for the cloths and garments made
from them give an idea of the wide range of textile production. The names refer
to the places where the textiles were made, or to the materials, their weave,
embroidery, and much more. Tins information can be used to trace the place of
origin of particular cloths and techniques as well as their distribution (and
imitation). Talented 'artisans with the necessary knowledge were very much in
demand and were requested to work for the courts. Their skill was often their
undoing. After wars the victors very often took them by force to their courts.
This explains the sudden appearance or disappearance of particular fabrics and
techniques in various regions of the Islamic world. Lor example, Chinese
silk-weavers were brought to Kufa by the Abbasids (Chehab, 1967). After his
campaign in 1401 Timur "confiscated the damascene silk-weavers and other
artisans and took them back with him to Central Asia (Lombard, 1987).
Much care was expended on the production of the raw
material and the control of the finished product. In sources from the end of
the twelfth century we find instructions on the cultivation of- cotton and
flax, silkworm breeding, dye making, etc. Manuals for market overseers contain
detailed information of procedures in the case of falsification of fabrics and
dyes. Kremer noted in the mid-nineteenth century that "silk is weighed under
judicial, supervision" (1855:8).
Sources describing the specific contexts in which
textiles were used show why textiles play such an outstanding role in Islamic
culture. It is in the nature of the sources that they concentrate particularly
on the courts and the urban upper class. They tell us about the fashions
and practices at the courts, the requirements of the urban population, the
circulation of textiles in social contexts, such as weddings or on special
occasions, and the distribution of textiles as a sign of recognition or
expression of benevolence from the powerful to their subordinates (Scarce,
1989; Lombard, 1987). Certain fabrics, patterns and dyes were reserved for the
Muslim rulers; the court and dignitaries, particular social groups and
religious minorities had their own turban cloths and were governed by precise
dress regulations. Particularly in the urban milieu clothes regulations were a
concrete expression of social relationships, a reflection of traditional norms
and values, as well as of the fashions of the time. The issuing of such
regulations was a political instrument whose power should not be
underestimated. All this demonstrates the value Islamic culture attached to
textiles, both materially and spiritually. But not only was the use of
particular textiles integrated into a cultural pattern of life, this was also
true of their production. The organization of work was determined by the old
crafts. Tills resulted in the interdependence of the various individual
craftsmen involved in the making of a textile, and thus in the emergence of
close, social and work relationships, and in a necessary sense of
solidarity. The economic life of the craftsmen and hence of a whole social
fabric is thus dependent on the continuity of a whole cultural pattern in which
the textiles have their place and which gives these objects their social and
cultural character. It is only against this background that the scale of the
changes which set in at the end of the nineteenth century can be gauged.
The integration of Syria into the expanding
European markets in the second third of the nineteenth Century, marked the
beginning of far- reaching socioeconomic changes which were to have
repercussions particularly on die textile industry. Syria was discovered as a
new market for European industrial fabrics, and the treaties concluded after
1838 between several European states and the Ottoman Empire ensured very
favorable export conditions for their goods. The European consuls had the
right to observe the market situation on the spot, defend the interests of
their governments and grant a number of special privileges to the local
Christians in order to secure and deepen business contacts. At the same time
Syria became an important supplier of silk as a raw material, especially for
the French silk industry in Lyon. The region that is now Lebanon was the
principal supplier for the French market, and silk was the staple commodity in
the port of Beirut, whence it was shipped to Marseille. Silk once again became
a political issue. In Syria the number of newly planted mulberry trees
increased rapidly, and in regions which had been regarded as1 secondary
silk-producing areas, such as the district around Safita, production was
intensified. At favorable altitudes many peasants began to plant mulberry
instead of their olive or fruit trees. But after 1930, when the demand for
Syrian (Lebanese) silk collapsed and the silk industry in Lyon went into
decline, many peasants who had switched to sericulture faced financial ruin.
The reeling of the silk, in so far as it was done in Syria at all, was
mechanized. Many Armenian women worked in the silk spinning workshops. Much
French capital was invested in these enterprises and the machinery needed was
imported from France. A number of Syrian businessmen who were in close contact
with Lyon founded factories or mechanized their textile production. Some of the
factories still use machines from this period. The flooding of the market with
cheap British fabrics, as well as the shortage and increased price of raw
materials for the traditional sector led to a drastic decline in Syrian textile
production: in Damascus, between 1830 and 1850, it was reduced by almost a
half, and the production of traditional articles fell by almost three quarters.
Kremer (1854:21) lamented (somewhat inaccurately): "The diwans which were
formerly covered with brocade, which, however, became famous under the name of
damask, are now covered with Lnglish calico." In the towns people
began to wear European dress.
Nevertheless, the Syrian textile Industry still
managed to defend as share in the market. It was able to do so by increased
concentration on the local markets, by supplying them with customary fabrics,
by introducing cheaper imitations of traditional cloths, by making structural
changes, such as processing industrial raw materials (e.g., yarns) imported
from Europe, and by establishing specialized centres of production in the
cities. Aleppo, for example, switched to the production of cheaper varieties of
traditional striped materials, to processing more cotton, and it remained the
centre of dyeing in Syria. Damascus specialized on the making of expensive
textiles such as gold brocade and silks, and concentrated on wool, some of
which was used for making Bedouin cloaks. In Homs, on the other hand, the
typical heavy silk cloths with patterns in gold and silver threads were still
woven for the peasant and nomad clientele.
The second serious setback for
the traditional textile sector in Syria was a consequence of the
Second World War and, more generally, of the modern development and
industrialization of Syria which came with independence .